Three tools, one source of truth: EFSA’s published scientific guidance and 240 opinions. Borgh doesn’t guess at what’s missing — it reads your text the way the NDA Panel does, and tells you where your data falls short before the clock starts.
Paste or upload a section. Borgh consults EFSA's published case law, then returns structured findings — each tied to the paragraph it comes from, ranked by how likely it is to stop the clock.
Not ready for a full review? Ask a specific question about EFSA requirements and get an answer linked to the exact guidance paragraph — no hallucinated citations, no guesswork.
Precedent, mined from every published novel food opinion: which deficiencies recur per section, and which ones predict a clock-stop. Know what triggers an additional data request before you submit.
Every finding maps to one of four levels — from what makes a dossier inadmissible, to what a reviewer might merely raise. You know what to fix first.
Gaps that make a dossier inadmissible — EFSA will not start the assessment until they are resolved.
Deficiencies that, by precedent, most often trigger an additional data request and stop the clock.
Points a reviewer is likely to raise — defensible, but worth pre-empting to avoid back-and-forth.
Improvements that strengthen the dossier without being strictly required.
Paste a draft and get structured findings in under ten minutes. Free while Borgh is in beta.
Start review